Skip to content

ISSN 2543-9472 eISSN 2544-0365

Facebook
Central European Review of Economics and Management
  • HOME
  • ABOUTExpand
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • ADVISORY BOARD
    • FOCUS AND SCOPE
    • PUBLISH IN CEREM
    • THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS
    • RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • VOLUMESExpand
    • Volumes 2026
    • VOLUMES 2025
    • VOLUMES 2024
    • VOLUMES 2023
    • VOLUMES 2022
    • VOLUMES 2021
    • VOLUMES 2020
    • VOLUMES 2019
    • VOLUMES 2018
    • VOLUMES 2017
    • VOLUMES 2016
    • VOLUMES 2015
    • ARCHIVES
  • PUBLISH IN CEREM
  • CONTACT
Search
Central European Review of Economics and Management
Volumes 2026

Vol. 10, No. 2-3, June – September 2026

Editor-in-chief:
Prof. Johannes (Joost) Platje

Deputy Editor-in-chief
Prof Kazim Baris Atici, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Co-Editor:
Prof Ali Emrouznejad, University of Surrey, United Kingdom
Dr. Wim Westerman, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Contents, Title: download
Full issue: download

Vol.10, No.2-3, June - September 2026

Vol. 10, No.2-3, June – September 2026, 7-53

Received: 5.08.2026, Revised: 23.08.2026, Accepted: 23.08.2026

Slavery and Slave-raiding in Africa in the Nineteenth Century: economics, ethics, amnesia and downplaying

Author: Hans VISSER
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Article: download

Aim:  The General Assembly of the United Nations on 25 March 2026 adopted a resolution declaring “the transatlantic slave trade the gravest crime against humanity”. Leaving the political rhetoric of “the gravest crime” to one side, I note that the history of slaving and slave-hunting in Africa was completely neglected, as was the Islamic involvement in the African slave trade and slave employment (and the role of Western traders in the Islamic slave trade as well.). This paper seeks to fill these gaps by offering an overview of slavery and slave-trading in nineteenth-century Africa and the place of African slavery in the global economic system.

Research methods: It is a study in economic history that is not content with relating the bare facts but also tries to uncover the motives and excuses of the actors for their actions. Emphasis is on the nineteenth century. It pays attention to the plight of the enslaved and to the arguments used by Muslims, Christians and Jews to justify slavery. A short account of the practices around manumission and emancipation is followed by a report of the attempts to end slave raiding, slave trading and slavery and of the motives for rejection of slavery.

Findings: It is true that in the Western world people more and more are aware of the sins of the past, but mostly with regard to the Atlantic slave trade. There is furthermore little awareness of the fact that Western actions against slavery in Africa seamlessly morphed into the Western colonisation of Africa Africa is singled out because it arguably suffered more than other continents, in the sense that slave-raiding and slavery led to a larger scale of depopulation than elsewhere.

Implications of the research: Ignorance of the facts may foster moral superiority both among Muslims critical of the Western slave-trading past and among non-Muslim Westerners critical of resistance in the Islamic world to the abolition of slavery. Highlighting this history is also important in view of attempts by white-supremacist groups to downplay the horrors of slavery. The article therefore argues for a fuller confrontation with the past.

Keywords: Slavery, Africa, Middle East, Trade and Labor Market Interactions, International Migration, Colonialism, Coercive Labor Markets

JEL Codes: F16, F22, F54, J47, N35, N37

doi: http:// 10.29015/cerem.1057

Vol. 10, No.2-3, June – September 2026, 55-80

Received: 28.08.2026, Revised: 15.09.2026, Accepted: 23.09.2026

Finished but Unshippable: how buyer-specified packaging becomes a factory’s hidden bottleneck

Author: Syed SYYEDUZZAMAN
Independent Researcher, Bangladesh

Article: download

Aim:  Contract manufacturers compete on delivery reliability but rarely control the packaging their buyers specify. This study examines how buyer-controlled specifications convert packaging from a material cost into a constraint on supplier capacity and shipment readiness.

Research methods: A retrospective embedded single-case design at a Bangladeshi ceramic tableware manufacturer triangulates a two-year management-account comparison, a ten-month carton-expenditure schedule, a channel-capacity workbook, order-level carton records and a controlled buyer standard. Evidence types are classified separately.

Findings: Packing materials reached 10.31 per cent of revenue and 34.4 per cent of raw-material cost; a separate schedule placed carton expenditure at 11.25 per cent. One buyer’s planning model assigned 3,000 pieces per day to online packing and 12,000 to shopline packing, a fourfold difference. Exception records show finished goods waiting for late, incorrect or unstarted cartons.

Originality/value of the article: The paper develops the specification-induced capacity tax, capacity consumed by required, correctly executed work that another firm controls, and treats packaging as a shadow production technology governing when output becomes shippable.

Implications of the research: Suppliers should plan configuration-adjusted packing capacity, place packaging readiness on the order’s critical path and record product-ready, packaging-ready and despatch dates. Buyers should assess the capacity implications of their specifications.

Limitations of the research: This is one retrospective case: the capacity workbook is a planning model, the accounts are not customer-specific and the exception files lack a denominator. The study bounds a mechanism; it estimates neither prevalence nor causal magnitude.

Keywords: packaging logistics; buyer-supplier governance; capacity planning; e-commerce fulfilment; shipment readiness; specification management; supply chain coordination; emerging-market manufacturing

JEL: L23, M11, L14

doi: http:/ 10.29015/cerem.1058

Vol. 10, No.2-3, June – September 2026, 81-99

Received: 27.07.2026, Revised: 23.09.2026, Accepted: 24.09.20266

Quiet and Passive Quitting in Relation to Work Engagement: a cross-validated SEM analysis

Authors: Marcin NOWAK
Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland

Marta PAWŁOWSKA-NOWAK
Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland

Piotr OSMAŃSKI
Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland

Article: download

Aim:  To assess whether acceptable in-sample structural equation model (SEM) fit is retained in held-out employee data and to propose a normalised generalisation gap (NG) index for reporting relative fit deterioration.

Research methods: Repeated 10 × 10 cross-validation was applied to CAWI survey data from 1,040 employees in Poland. A model linking quiet quitting and passive quitting to work engagement was estimated on training folds and evaluated with RMSEA on training and test folds.

Findings: Mean RMSEA increased from 0.076 (SD = 0.002) in training folds to 0.143 (SD = 0.014) in test folds; mean NG was 0.89 (SD = 0.20). The systematic gap shows that stable in-sample fit does not imply adequate out-of-sample fit.

Originality/value: The article provides a transparent, descriptive indicator for complementing conventional SEM fit reporting with held-out-sample evidence. The proposed interpretive bands for NG_RMSEA are provisional, have not been empirically validated, and should not be used as established cut-offs.

Implications: Researchers and HR analysts should report train-test fit deterioration rather than rely exclusively on a single-sample fit.

Limitations: The evidence is based on one cross-sectional Polish sample, internal cross-validation, and RMSEA alone; the proposed NG bands are provisional and require simulation and external validation.

Keywords: quiet quitting, passive quitting, work engagement, SEM, machine learning. JEL: M12, M54, J28

doi: http:/ 10.29015/cerem.1056

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER:

  • Login
  • Register
  • Author Guidelines

PUBLISH IN CEREM:

  • CALL FOR PAPERS
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • FOCUS AND SCOPE
  • PUBLISH IN CEREM
  • THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS
  • RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS

News

Conference 2026
18–19 June 2026 | WSB Merito University

The journal has been approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS.

The Central European Review of Economics and Management is now available on EconStor

Publisher - Wydawca:

WSB Merito University Wrocław
ul. Fabryczna 29-31
53-609 Wrocław

Contact:

Editorial Office CEREM
WSB Merito University Wrocław
  • 29-31 Fabryczna street , building A, room 226
    53-609 Wrocław Poland
  • +48 71 376 23 43
  • redakcja@wroclaw.merito.pl
  • Editor-in-chief: Prof. Johannes Platje.
  • johannes.platje@wroclaw.merito.pl
Facebook Facebook

Info:

  • SUBMISSION PREPARATION CHECKLIST
  • PRIVACY STATEMENT
  • COPYRIGHT NOTICE
  • COOKIE FILES POLICY
System Risk Assessment – an online instrument for sustainability governance

System Risk Assessment – an online instrument for sustainability governance

© 2026 Central European Review of Economics and Management

icon-CC-cerem
Accessibility Adjustments

Powered by OneTap

How long do you want to hide the toolbar?
Hide Toolbar Duration
Select your accessibility profile
Vision Impaired Mode
Enhances website's visuals
Seizure Safe Profile
Clear flashes & reduces colour
ADHD Friendly Mode
Focused browsing, distraction-free
Blindness Mode
Reduces distractions, improves focus
Epilepsy Safe Mode
Dims colours and stops blinking
Content Modules
Font Size

Default

Line Height

Default

Colour Modules
Orientation Modules
Central European Review of Economics and Management
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Scroll to top
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • ADVISORY BOARD
    • FOCUS AND SCOPE
    • PUBLISH IN CEREM
    • THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS
    • RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • VOLUMES
    • Volumes 2026
    • VOLUMES 2025
    • VOLUMES 2024
    • VOLUMES 2023
    • VOLUMES 2022
    • VOLUMES 2021
    • VOLUMES 2020
    • VOLUMES 2019
    • VOLUMES 2018
    • VOLUMES 2017
    • VOLUMES 2016
    • VOLUMES 2015
    • ARCHIVES
  • PUBLISH IN CEREM
  • CONTACT